Last week I submitted my thesis, workshop report and conference presentation for my MSc in Advanced Computer Science. Two days after my submission I was also required to present my research and answer a few questions fielded from a lecturer in Yorks Department of Computer Science who had not previously seen my work. The video shown above is the one which will be used to mark my presentation and question answering skills.
Having completed the three deliverables and the presentation my research semester, and thus my masters, is complete.
I expect to find out my final result in 4 to 6 weeks, however currently I am more focused on my impending start at Trainline — which I hope to write about soon.
When you design software you usually have a few use cases in mind, in the case of EpsilonGit the use case I keep coming back to is a project lead who wants an overview of how his team is working and how they are using their version control software.
A short while later I made a few small adaptations to package the orrery as a Windows Store (now called Universal Windows) Application. I thought a few people might enjoy watching the planets go around the screen, but didn’t really expect too many people to download it. To be completely honest, I mainly packaged it as an app to get points for the App Builder Rewards competition.
I haven’t touched the orrery, packaged as Solar System Simulation on Windows, for years. However, I wrote a little while back about someone who used it to teach their daughter about space, an unexpected use but a nice one.
Today I got an email from a student in Brazil who wondered if the software had a function to see planet locations at specific dates, as he liked the simple 2D graphics and wanted to use them to make a tattoo of the layout of the solar system on his birthday. Strange, but cool.
Unfortunately the Solar System Simulation (which is a gratuitous name — its in no way even close to a ‘simulation’) doesn’t support this function — but its a cool idea, and one I wouldn’t have thought of.
It might be fun to add it in one day, and see how popular some of the ideas I have would be compared to those that a user has had and wanted to be implemented enough to go to the effort to email me about it. I suspect the user submitted ideas might be more popular, because no one knows how well a customer users your product as well as a customer. But I might be wrong, it could be an interesting bit of research.
So, expect the unexpected uses of your software and services — both in positive ways, such as odd-but-exciting use cases, and negative, such as malformed input — but also be excited by the prospect.
P.S ‘Solar System Simulation’ is still available and works on Windows 8, 8.1 and 10.
Last week any Microsoft Student Partners who wanted to continue to be in the programme for the 2015-2016 academic year had to reapply, as I will be graduating in September I of course was unable to do so, bringing around the end of my time as an MSP.
I’d like to take this time to thank Phil Cross, Paul Lo, Ben Nunney and all the others who made being as MSP both great fun and really rewarding. I’ve posted about some of the cool stuff we got up to before:
- Imagine Cup
- North European MSP Summit
- MSP UK Summit
- Appy Christmas
- Campus Party
- Developing App Builder Rewards
Whilst we got a lot of cool perks like endless free Windows Phone and Windows 8 devices, this paled in comparison to the opportunities of travel and honing our skills both in presenting and dealing with people and in programming and development.
If you’re thinking about becoming an MSP — go for it. You’ll be afforded a lot of opportunities the average student just doesn’t get, which both you and future employers will love.
One of the questions I had to answer for both myself and interviewers was “What do you want to achieve in your first job?”. My answer was always a quote I read on a blog by a programmer hero of mine, Jeff Atwood. He said you should, as a junior software engineer, “endeavor to be the dumbest guy in the room” which simply means place yourself around intelligent experienced programmers and learn! This is what I wanted to do and I’ve been fortunate enough to be hired by a company that has an environment that will allow me to do that – thetrainline.com.
thetrainline.com sells train tickets in the UK and Europe both from its own website and by providing the software for Train Operating Companies such as Virgin Trains and First. They operate out of an office in Farringdon, one tube stop from London Kings Cross station.
I start in late September and honestly cannot wait to learn and earn with them. My official job title will be “Agile Developer”.
A big thank you is in order to Teck Loy Low who I met on The Hacktrain and subsequently put me in contact with thetrainline. If this isn’t a good advert for getting yourself involved with hackathons and the like I don’t know what is.
My CV – This only gets you the interview, you have to do the rest
It feels like yesterday, but it has now been 50 weeks since I graduated from The University of Hull. I know this because its my Birthday in 2 weeks — and theres the small matter of Charlotte graduating (Well done!). The ever-accelerating passage of time has meant that in recent months I have turned my attentions to planning out what I intend to do once my MSc is over.
This blog is primarily written for me to look back on in a few years and hopefully say “look how far I’ve come” or quite possibly ask where it all went wrong from here. However, it may include some useful tidbits of information for future graduates looking for jobs.
My job hunt started when a company well known for their search engine approached me offering me an interview for a Graduate Software Engineering position in either Mountain View or London. This was exciting. I was invited for a final interview having completed a telephone interview with an software engineer/team leader. At this point I had to decide if I wanted to work in either London or Moutain View — opting to work in Moutain View meant that my interview had to take place within a week due to certain visa requirements — in retrospect I should have waited and gone for the London job with more time to prepare, however the draw of a Californian life-style was too much! I can’t actually write about what I was asked in the interview, however I can say that it was a fantastic learning experience. Anyone who gets a chance to interview at a large tech firm certainly should, even if its only for the chance to better their skills.
In the end I wasn’t offered the job. I was dissapointed but the lady from HR told me I was close to getting it and should reapply in a year or two once I had more experience under my belt. This was both reassuring and something nice to work towards.
Around the same time as that interview I was engadged in a process alongside Dr. Dan Franks to apply for funding for a PhD program, in which I would work on an Evolutionary Computation project dealing with issues of crowd behaviour in evolved systems and comparisons to the real-world. This was an awesome project and I appreciate the work Dr. Franks put into my application with me. I also appreciate his honesty when it came to discussing whether doing a PhD was right for me at this time in my life — in the end I came to the decision it wasn’t. Whilst I love research and doing new and exciting things I was more interested in getting my teeth into some real-world software engineering projects and improving my skills in that area. I hope that a PhD is something that I come back to at some point later in life. I was offered the PhD on a full stipend and fees paid, but turned it down after a lot of reflection.
A few months passed as I knuckled down on the last few modules of the taught portion of my course but now, as I wrote previously, I am in the research semester of my Masters Degree — whilst this is in some ways no less busy than the taught portion of the course it does have the advantange of being a period of time in which I don’t have to be physically located in York for anything other than a weekly supervisor meeting — this has given me the oppertunity to go job seeking again.
Without enumerating over each interview process I’ve gone through over the last 3 weeks, because there been rather a few, I want to make the following observations:
- You will probably recieve a few emails thanking you for your time but informing you that the company doesn’t wish to move ahead with your application. A few rejections in a row can get you a bit down, but…
- There are many reasons for not being offered a job. As many, if not more, than there are to be offered one. It could be something as simple as not being as enthusiastic about their technical platform as you are about say, Node.js. So don’t take anything personally and behave professionally, don’t take it to heart.
- Doing interviews will undoutedly make you a better Software Engineer. After a few weeks of Data Structure, Algorithm and Software Architecture questions coming at you in a high pressure environment you’ll notice how much your thought processes have changed and how much you’ve improved.
- Attending interviews is a great way to discover if you think you could handle commuting every day. In the past 2 weeks I’ve travlled over 3,000 miles doing interviews (York to London return is 431 and a half miles). I came to the conclusion I could, quite happily, travel a (shorter) distance each day
- You will know if you would work for a company within an hour of being there. I remember one interview in particular where I knew very quickly there was no way I would want to work there (the best thing to do in this situation is continue as normal and be professional). Other times you’ll experience what you percieve to be your dream work environment. Remember, you’re interviewing the company just as much as they’re interviewing you. You’ll be spending 8 hours a day there, 5 days a week for the foresable future. There are plenty of CS jobs avaliable so make sure you get one which is good for you. If you like a job that also means you’ll work better for them, so its good for them too if you turn down a job you wouldn’t love.
- Every company interviews in a slightly different way. I personally found a mixture of programming on a PC as well as ‘whiteboarding’ data structure and algorithms gave me the best environment in which I could show what I percieve to be my skills. Some companies only do one, or the other, which is a shame.
- You should read “Code Complete” and “Programming Interviews Exposed” and brush up on your Data Structures and Algorithms before going to any interviews (I wish I’d done this before going to that search engine company), you’ll thank yourself for it.
- Companies love enthusiasm. Proving you’re enthusiastic about Computer Science is quite easy, especially if you have a blog like this one, however as quite a stoic person I found it hard at times to show enthusiasm for a companies product — especially if that product was not public facing and therefore I’d never had a chance to use it. I’m not really sure what to say or do to help these situations.
- You will be asked about anything, no matter how minor it is, that is on your CV. Fortunately everything on my CV is true so it wasn’t too bad, I can only imagine how hard it is if it isn’t.
- There are some questions you will be asked by every company. You should work on refining your answers over time. The two I got asked everywhere were “Why don’t you have an A-Level in Maths?” and “Why did you decide to do a masters degree at York?”.
Just yesterday I formally accepted one of the 4 job offers I had received in this process at a fantastic company, for whom I’m very excited to be working for. I’ll write more about that in my next blog post!
One of the most important things for any modern business is its internet presence. If you’re not on the internet, or not active and visible on the internet, you might as well not exist to a large group of people. Search Engine Optimisation is the process of improving ones website so that it might appear higher up the Google Search rankings, where more people are likely to find it.
At the same time, one of the most interesting elements of modern software and services is its openness. Everyone from local councils to The Association of Train Operating Companies is currently in the process of opening up their data to the world and hoping someone innovative, or with a different set of skills and resources, can make something they either couldn’t imagine themselves or didn’t have the time and money to build — for mutual benefit.
One possible enhancements to SEO and Openness for an organisation is to make their website semantic. The definition of Semantics, according to The Oxford Dictionary, is:
The branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. The two main areas are logical semantics, concerned with matters such as sense and reference and presupposition and implication, and lexical semantics, concerned with the analysis of word meanings and relations between them.
The main takeaway point is that things, in this case HTML markup for websites, have meaning. We need to make sure that the meanings we are making visible to the world actually mean what we want them to mean. A nice side-effect of this is that web pages become a lot easier to parse or screen-scrape and extract information from.
Prior to HTML5 the best way to give meaning to a tag was to use an id. So if you were to markup a simple website with a header and a list of news stories you might come up with something like this:
<div id="header"> <h1>News Website</h1> <img src="logo.png" alt="logo"/> </div> <div id="newslist"> <div class="story"> <h2>News Title</h2> <p>Here is some exciting news!</p> </div> <div class="story"> <h2>Another bit of news</h2> <p>A shame, as no news is good news!</p> </div> </div>
Whilst this is relatively clean code, it does come with some issues. How is a screen-reader or search engine spider meant to know the meaning of a “story” element for example? Whilst it seems simple viewing it as a human being, we must remember that there are literally thousands of possibilities for element id names that mean “story”.
HTML5 provides some new Semantic Tags which allow us to bake meaning into elements themselves. Check out the example below which simplifies and improves the previous code using the new HTML 5 semantic tags.
<header> <h1>News Website</h1> <img src="logo.png" alt="logo"/> </header> <main> <article> <h2>News Title</h2> <p>Here is some exciting news!</p> </article> <article> <h2>Another bit of news</h2> <p>A shame, as no news is good news!</p> </article> </main>
This implementation allows a browser, spider or screen reader to accurately understand what each element is for as the tag names used have been standardized by the W3C. In case you’re wondering the `<article>` tag is what is detected by browsers like IE and Safari to show a Reading View.
Wherever possible you should aim to use the semantic tags over generatic tags such as `<div>`. It makes code easier to read in addition to being more semantically correct. A full list of the HTML5 semantic tags and their meanings can be found on DiveIntoHTML5.
The Open Graph Protocol
Whilst I had been using HTML5 semantic elements for some time, I wanted to do more as part of the CS Blogs project both in terms of SEO and improving user experience through semantics.
I started with the Open Graph Protocol. The Open Graph protocol was developed by Facebook to allow websites to integrate better with Facebook, both in app and on the web, however other Social Media services also take advantage of open graph, including Pintrest, Twitter and even Google+.
The Open Graph protocol is implemented as a series of `<meta>` tags that you place in the head of your HTML pages. Each page can describe itself as identifying a Person, Movie, Song or other graph object using code such as that shown below for a Blogger on CS Blogs.com
<meta property="og:title" content="The Computer Science Blogs profile of Daniel Brown" /> <meta property="og:site_name" content="Computer Science Blogs"/> <meta property="og:type" content="profile"/> <meta property="og:locale" content="en_GB"/> <meta property="og:image" content="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/342035" /> <meta property="profile:first_name" content="Daniel"/> <meta property="profile:last_name" content="Brown"/> <meta property="profile:username" content="dannybrown"/>
As you can see most open graph properties start with an `og:` suffix, except those particular to the type of content you are making available, which are suffixed with the type name. The documentation for what tags are available can be found on the Open Graph Website.
This code will then be used by Facebook when someone links to that particular web page in their messages, or on their newsfeed. Here’s an example:
Whilst open graph is great for this purpose it does have some limitations. Each page can only be of one type, and you cannot add semantics for more than one element. This limitation is a problem for pages such as csblogs.com/bloggers which represents multiple people.
Despite its limitations its still worth implementing open graphs on pages for which it makes sense, especially if those pages are likely to be shared on social media.
Facebook, as usual, have some great development tools for open graph including the Open Graph Debugger, which allows you to see how Facebook interprets your page (but because Open Graph is a standard it’ll also help you debug any issues with Pintrest, Twitter etc.)
Schema.org is a standard developed in a weird moment of collaboration between the 3 search engine giants — Google, Microsoft and Yahoo. It allows you to specify the meaning of certain elements of content. You can technically do this using 3 different types of syntax, however in this blog post I will focus on micro data, partly because its the easiest to understand, fits inline with your pages and is an official part of the HTML5 spec, but also because its the only format currently fully supported by the Google search engine.
To begin with here is the HTML 5 structure of a blog post before it has been marked up with schema.org micro data. It should be pretty simple to understand if you’ve checked out the HTML 5 semantic elements mentioned previously.
<article> <header> <h2><a href="dannybrown.net">A Blog Post</a></h2> </header> <img src="dannybrown.net/image.png" alt="Featured Image"/> <p>This is an exert... <a class="read-more" href="dannybrown.net">Read more →</a></p> <footer> <div class="article-info"> <a class="avatar" href="/bloggers/dannybrown"> <img class="avatar" src="dannybrown.net/danny.png" alt="Avatar"/> </a> <a class="article-author" href="/bloggers/dannybrown">Daniel Brown</a> <p class="article-date">1 day ago</p> </div> </footer> </article>
In order to markup our html with Schema.org we need to do a few things:
- Determine which Schema.org schema best suits the element we are describing.
- Determine the scope of that element
- Add the microdata attributes to our HTML
For our blog post example above the most relevant schema is BlogPosting. You can see all of the different types in a hierarchy at schema.org. The scope of the BlogPosting is the entire block contained within the `<article>` tags.
The scope of an item is delimited on the opening tag of our scope using the `itemscope` attribute. Read it as “Every bit of micro data within this element is about one item”. When we define the `itemscope` we also need to give it is type — this is done with the `itemtype` attribute. The value of the `itemtype` is the url of the schema.org schema — in our case `http://schema.org/BlogPosting`.
The values of fields that make up our schema, for example the “headline” of a blogpost are either other schemas or the values of elements. Here’s a fully schema’d up blog post:
<article itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/BlogPosting"> <header> <h2 itemprop="headline"><a href="dannybrown.net">A semantic blog post</a></h2> </header> <img itemprop="image" src="dannybrown.net/image.png" alt="Featured Image"/> <p itemprop="articleBody">This is an exert... <a itemprop="url" class="read-more" href="dannybrown.net">Read more →</a></p> <footer> <div class="article-info"> <div itemscope itemprop="author" itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"> <a class="avatar" href="/bloggers/dannybrown"> <img class="avatar" itemprop="image" src="dannybrown.net/danny.png" alt="Avatar"/> </a> <a class="article-author" itemprop="sameAs" href="/bloggers/dannybrown"><span itemprop="givenName">Daniel</span> <span itemprop="familyName">Brown</span></a> </div> <p class="article-date" itemprop="datePublished">1 day ago</p> </div> </footer> </article>
Here we can see that just by assigning an `itemprop` attribute to a tag, the textual content it contains becomes the value of the named field. We can also see that a Person schema can be nested inside our BlogPosting schema to give us a rich author ‘object’.
One other thing worth noting here is that I elected to add `<span>` elements (which don’t change the visual layout of the HTML page) around the first and last names of the author so as to be able to correctly mark them up with `givenName` and `familyName` itemprops.
Google provides a debugger for Schema.org, which came in great use whilst I was added in support for CS Blogs, its called the Structured Data Testing Tool. The output for a the home page of csblogs.com is shown below:
As you can see using Schema.org means that the Google search engine can actually understand what is on the page, and therefore its semantic meaning. csblogs.com is therefore more likely to go up in search terms that include the word blog, or search for the names of the authors mentioned for example.
Hopefully this blog post will have made you think about what you can do to make your websites more semantic — and therefore better for search engines, accessibility and in terms of openness. You can use all three of the technologies above at the same time, and I would implore you to do so. In return you’ll benefit from better Search Engine rankings, your users will benefit from better Social Media integration and screen reading for those with disabilities, and search engines can point people to web pages with a better understanding of what that page represents rather than just scanning for keywords.